User talk:Ludde23

From MedBib.com - Medicine & Nature

Welcome!

Hello, Ludde23, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Bachrach44 14:33, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Contents

Discussion archives

Yes, I am still around

Thank you for your enquiries about my well-being. I am sorry that I haven't had time to do more entries for the year timelines. I am very busy at work and when I do have spare time I am focusing on doing more research not only to add more information to the years entries on Wikipedia but also to improve some of the biography entries for individuals covered by the period that I have already updated on Wikipedia. So you will see my Wikipedia name appear occasionally against certain biographies of ancient Greeks and Romans while I start doing more research on the remaining years from 150 BC towards the birth of Christ. Regards. --Chaleyer61 (talk) 00:47, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Blank sections

Re: [1], why the insistence on a blank section? It's empty, so there's no header needed. Powers T 13:27, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

In order to keep the year articles consistent with each other. If those headers are always there, it's easy to put births and deaths on the pages in the future, without people making up their own headers like "Born" or "Died" etc. /Ludde23 Talk Contrib 18:46, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

emergency-numbers proposal

I see that you blanked the subst:ed and modified {{multimove}} templates that I had earlier added to several talk pages, such as, for example Talk:112. I can only assume that you did so because you strongly oppose my proposal, in which case you should probably cast an "oppose" vote at Talk:911, or discuss here. Please reply to this message on my talk page. 69.140.152.55 (talk) 14:39, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

I hope it was not to express opposition; Disruption is not a good way to express such opinions. But I'm puzzled as to what else it could be. I'll watch with interest for your reply. Andrewa (talk) 02:54, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Peg Entwistle Death

Hi! I'm James Zeruk Jr.--Peg Entwistle's authorized biographer. I left some interesting and factual information on her Wiki Discussion page regarding your wonder about when she actually died. I hope you will take a look a what I wrote. Thanks. Jameszerukjr (talk) 08:36, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Wikimania 2010 could be coming to Stockholm!

I'm leaving you a note as you may be interested in this opportunity.

People from all six Nordic Wiki-communities (sv, no, nn, fi, da and is) are coordinating a bid for Wikimania 2010 in Stockholm. I'm sending you a message to let you know that this is occurring, and over the next few months we're looking for community support to make sure this happens! See the bid page on meta and if you like such an idea, please sign the "supporters" list at the bottom. Tack (or takk), and have a wonderful day! Mike H. Fierce! 09:10, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Translation

Hi, I found you through WP:BABEL in search of someone to translate, or at least, give me the basic gist of, a news story. Would that be at all possible? Thanks, Seegoon (talk) 15:39, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Sorry for taking so long with the answer, but I haven't been around my computer today. What was it you wanted to have translated? /Ludde23 Talk Contrib 21:05, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Roman Army

What was wrong with making a link in 9 ? Lars 05:34, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Nothing. Why do you ask? /Ludde23 Talk Contrib 08:21, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Cause you undid it. Lars 13:00, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
No I didn't. However, I undid the removal of spaces between the asterisks and the text. Check out the article. /Ludde23 Talk Contrib 14:52, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, my mistake. Thnks for your patience! Lars 14:55, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the smile. Made me glad. /Ludde23 Talk Contrib 15:08, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

359 BC

Hi! I saw where you undid my edits on 359 BC. I was trying to fix "edit" section headers that are all bunched up. Do you have any suggestions on how to fix this? Cheers! TNX-Man 11:42, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi! No, I don't have any idea of how to fix it (I'm not quite sure what you're talking about), but I guess I was a little bit too fast in removing your additions. I just a lot of extra templates, with, as it seemed to me, no use - they only seemed to create lots of empty space at the top of the article. However, I'm sorry for having just rudely removed your edits. But what exactly do these templates do? /Ludde23 Talk Contrib 12:00, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
At the top right of each section, there's a box marked "edit" that allows you to edit a specific section instead of having to edit the entire article. On 359 BC, all of the "edit" boxes were bunched up in the same place. The {{fixbunching}} was an attempt to sort it out. The template forces the text sections not to overlap the templates. Let me know what you think, because if I can work out a solution, it looks like the other year articles may have the same issue. Cheers! TNX-Man 13:14, 2 October 2008 (UTC)


Is/Was

Please explain how 69 BC "was" a year in the Julian calendar [2]. I find this a little confusing. When you revert a good faith edit a more detailed edit summary is desirable. I see now that you did put a comment on the article talk page Talk:69 BC. It would be good to mention that in your edit summaries when you do a revert. Best to continue the discussion at the article talk page. Thanks.Edison (talk) 04:18, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

hey

you're cool : D Evaunit♥666♥ 13:26, 23 October 2008 (UTC)