User talk:James Michael 1
From MedBib.com - Medicine & Nature
Image copyright problem with File:World trade center 11 september 2001.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:World trade center 11 september 2001.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:55, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:World trade center 11 september 2001.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:World trade center 11 september 2001.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — neuro(talk)(review) 14:30, 31 March 2009 (UTC) --— neuro(talk)(review) 14:30, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject Software
 |
Hello James Michael 1. You have been invited to join WikiProject Software, a WikiProject dedicated to improving the Software-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in, or edits relating to or within the scope of the project. If you would like to join or just help out a bit, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of project members. You may also wish to add {{User WikiProject Software}} to your userpage and {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Software/Announcement-u}} to the top of your talk page with the heading ==WikiProject Software Announcement==. If you know someone who might be interested, please pass this message onto others by pasting this code into their talk page {{subst:Software invite|~~~~}} with the following heading == WikiProject Software ==.
Thanks, |
Orphaned non-free image (File:Google search.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Google search.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 21:44, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (File:Windows NT 3.1 logo.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Windows NT 3.1 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ♥ichi 23:38, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Non-free screenshots
Hi. Please don't replace text logos with fair use pictures with more restrictive licenses, such as the Windows NT logos you've recently changed. Kindly revert to the old logo or I'll do it myself. — Jan Hofmann (talk) 06:20, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- OK, Jan. I did it. James Michael 1 (talk) 01:33, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Windows 95
Hello James,
I have some concerns with some of the corrections you made to the Windows 95 article. First of all, you make several unrelated changes in a single edit, making it difficult to undo the ones I disagree with while preserving those that are clear improvements. It also results in the fact that the edit summary you provide isn't very informative. Might I suggest you spread unrelated changes over a number of edits? What concerns me most is that some of your changes seem to be semi-automated and not really well thought through. For example in this edit [1]: why do you thought it was necessary to remove the non-breaking spaces in the dates (they prevent awkwardly placed line breaks in the table on lower resolution screens) or the second column from the references? Or here: [2]. It is general not necessary to pipe redirects and would actually be annoying if the article Windows 3.1x was ever renamed, split or merged. An here [3] you (incorrectly) swapped the "Notes" and "References" sections. In larger articles the "Notes" section is intended for footnotes (<ref>'s) while the References section is usually reserved for those references that are interesting for further reading (and should probably be called "Further reading" to make that clear.)
I hope I'm not being overly harsh, these are just some (in my opinion, of course) tips to improve your edits. Cheers, —Ruud 16:02, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- Hello, Ruud.
- Thank you for your post. I love beauty, correctness and accuracy. Therefore my corrections makes article better (in my opinion).
- I hope you understand me. Delighted. James Michael 1 (talk) 15:06, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Proposed major reforms to decade articles
Hi - I noticed you have contributed recently to one or more of the decade articles (1990s, 1960s etc). I am proposing some major changes to these articles, as I have outlined in Talk:1990s#Suggested_reform_of_decade_articles, and I would be interested in hearing your views in the first instance. Thanks. Kransky (talk) 08:54, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
European Union
Hello James: The question is rather confusing. Herman Van Rompuy is formally the president of the Europan Council as of December 1. He will chair this institution until May 31, 2012. However, due to other engagements, Van Rompuy will, so to say, effectively take up his position on January 1, 2010. That's probably why some media, French Wikipedia, and others, still refer him as 'President elect'. The question is - should we do the same? best regards, Hapsala (talk) 13:03, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
"I Need Love" and Close to Seven
Hi James Michael and sorry for my bad English, as it's not my native language. I redirected "I Need Love" to its parent album, because the song fails WP:NSONGS. This page says :
- Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable.
=> The song didn't appear on any chart, didn't win significant awards or honors and hasn't been performed by several notable artists. There is no substential coverage in reliable source to prove notability. So it shouldn't get its own page.
- Notability aside, a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album.
=> In addition, I pretty sure that the article won't be expanded and will remain a stub.
I hope I answered your question. Best regards, Europe22 (talk) 17:09, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Windows Server 2008 R2 logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Windows Server 2008 R2 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:16, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Windows NT 3.1 logo.png
A tag has been placed on File:Windows NT 3.1 logo.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
| CompTIA A+ |
Koman90 (Talk), A CompTIA A+ Certified IT Technitian |
06:09, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Windows 3.0 logo.png
A tag has been placed on File:Windows 3.0 logo.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
| CompTIA A+ |
Koman90 (Talk), A CompTIA A+ Certified IT Technitian |
06:11, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Windows Server 2008 R2 logo.png
A tag has been placed on File:Windows Server 2008 R2 logo.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
| CompTIA A+ |
Koman90 (Talk), A CompTIA A+ Certified IT Technitian |
06:26, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
Are you really bored tonight?
I'm curious by all your edits, like hyphens Template:Lunar_eclipse_set_1951–1955, what's the point except ugly URLs? Template names are not even visible to articles! Also please keep the open links of eclipse articles 1900-2100 which will be expanded. It's all in progress. SockPuppetForTomruen (talk) 06:15, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
edits to article GIMP
I have reverted the majority of your edits to GIMP, no reasoning was given as to your changes, and the reason was not obvious or clearly an improvement. We welcome further edits to the page, but if the reasoning behind your changes is not obvious please make a note of why it was changed that way. --Gnepets (talk) 09:56, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Sandra discography
Hi James, can you possibly post a new photo image of her here, if you could, please? Thanks. Best, --Discographer (talk) 22:58, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
All material adapted used from Wikipedia is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.
Seeking health information online: does Wikipedia matter?