Omotic languages
From MedBib.com - Medicine & Nature
The Omotic languages are spoken in southwestern Ethiopia. The Ge'ez alphabet is used to write some Omotic languages, the Roman alphabet for some others. They are fairly agglutinative,[1] and have complex tonal systems (see Bench language).
Language List
The Omotic Languages include:
|
Anfillo
Ari
Bambassi
Basketto
Bench
Boro
Chara
|
Dime
Dizzi
Dorze
Gamo-Gofa
Ganza
Hammer-Banna
Hozo
|
Kachama-Ganjule
Kara
Kefa
Kore
Male
Melo
Mocha
|
Nayi
Oyda
Shakacho
Sheko
Welaytta (Welamo)
Yemsa
Zayse-Zergulla
|
Lionel Bender (2000) classifies this group as follows:
- South Omotic/Aroid (Hamer, Banna, Aari, Dime, Karo)
- North Omotic/Non-Aroid
- Mao (Bambassi (Bambeshi), Hozo, Sezo, Ganza)
- Dizoid (Dizi, Dorsha, Sheko (Shako), Nayi (Nao))
- Gonga-Gimojan
- Gonga/Kefoid (Boro, Anfillo, Kafa, Shekkacho language (Mocha))
- Gimojan
- Yem/Janjero (Yemsa (Janjero), Fuga)
- Ometo-Gimira
- Gimira (Bench, She, Mer)
- Chara
- Ometo (Male; Basketo; Kachama, Ganjule, Koreete (Koyra), Gidichho, Zayse, Zergulla; Welayta (Ometo), Oyta (Oyda), Dorze, Melo, Gamo, Gofa, Dawro)
Apart from terminology, this differs from Harold Fleming's earlier (1976) classification in including the Mao languages, whose affiliation had originally been controversial, and in abolishing the "Gimojan" group. There are also differences in the subclassification of Ometo, which is not given here.
Hayward (2003) separate out the Mao languages and slightly rearranges the Gimojan languages:
- South Omotic: Hamar, Aari, Dime
- Mao: Mao of Begi, Mao of Bambeshi, Diddesa
- North Omotic
- Dizoid: Dizi, Sheko, Nayi
- Ta-Ne languages
- Gonga: Kafa, Shakicho (Mocha), Shinasha, Anfillo
- Gimojan
- Yem (earlier known as 'Janjero')
- Gimira: Bench, She
- Ometo-C'ara: C’ara
- North Ometo: Wolaitta, Gamo, Gofa, Dawro, Malo, Basketo, Oyda
- East Ometo: Zayse, Zargulla, Harro and other lacustrine varieties, Koorete
- South Ometo: Maale
Classification
Omotic is generally considered the most divergent branch of the Afro-Asiatic languages.[2] Greenberg had classified it as the west branch of Cushitic. Bender (1975) established to most linguists' satisfaction that it is not Cushitic, but a separate family, which he and Harold Fleming made a primary branch of Afro-Asiatic, though a few linguists such as Lamberti (1991) and Zaborksi (1986) maintain the West Cushitic position. Blench (2006) notes that Omotic shares honey-related vocabulary with the rest of Afro-Asiatic, but not cattle-related vocabulary, suggesting that the split occurred before the advent of pastoralism.
However, other scholars doubt that the Omotic languages are part of the Afro-Asiatic language family[3], and the Italian linguist Antonio Loprieno points out that "it is still a matter of debate whether Omotic really belongs to the Afro-Asiatic language family".[4] The noted Chadicist Paul Newman (1980) regards the differences between the Omotic languages and the other Afro-Asiatic languages as being so great as to cast doubt on their very inclusion in the phylum. In keeping with Newman's views is Rolf Theil (2006), who proposes that Omotic be treated instead as an entirely independent language family on the basis that no closer genetic relations have been demonstrated between Omotic and Afro-Asiatic than between Omotic and any other language family.[5]
Notes
- ^ Raymond G. Gordon, Jr, ed. 2005. Ethnologue: Languages of the World. 15th edition. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
- ^ Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza, The History and Geography of Human Genes, (Princeton University Press: 1993), p.174: "...Omotic is generally considered the most divergent branch of Afro-Asiatic."
- ^ R. J. Hayward, Omotic Language Studies, (University of London School of Oriental and African Studies: 1990), p.ix: "At the other end of the spectrum, there have been those who have felt unhappy about the inclusion of Omotic within Afroasiatic at all"
- ^ Antonio Loprieno, Ancient Egyptian: A Linguistic Introduction, (Cambridge University Press: 1995), p.5
- ^ Is Omotic Afro-Asiatic? by Rolf Theil, pp.1&2: "I claim to show that no convincing arguments have been presented, and that OM should be regarded as an independent language family. No closer genetic relations have been demonstrated between OM and AA than between OM and any other language family."
Sources cited
- Bender, M. Lionel. 2000. Comparative Morphology of the Omotic Languages. Munich: LINCOM.
- Fleming, Harold. 1976. Omotic overview. In The Non-Semitic Languages of Ethiopia, ed. by M. Lionel Bender, pp. 299-323. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
- Newman, Paul. 1980. The classification of Chadic within Afroasiatic. Universitaire Pers Leiden.
General Omotic bibliography
- Bender, M. L. 1975. Omotic: a new Afroasiatic language family. (University Museum Series, 3.) Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University.
- Blench, Roger. 2006. Archaeology, Language, and the African Past. AltaMira Press
- Hayward, Richard J., ed. 1990. Omotic Language Studies. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.
- Hayward, Richard J. 2003. Omotic: the "empty quarter" of Afroasiatic linguistics. In Research in Afroasiatic Grammar II: selected papers from the fifth conference on Afroasiatic languages, Paris 2000, ed. by Jacqueline Lecarme, pp. 241-261. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- Lamberti, Marcello. 1991. Cushitic and its classification. Anthropos 86(4/6):552-561.
- Zaborski, Andrzej. 1986. Can Omotic be reclassified as West Cushitic? In Gideon Goldenberg, ed., Ethiopian Studies: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference, pp. 525-530. Rotterdam: Balkema.
See also
External links