| This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Please improve this article if you can. (December 2008) |
| Haplogroup R1a | |
| Time of origin | 15,000 years BP |
| Place of origin | southern Central Asia or South Asia or Western Caucasus or Eastern Europe |
| Ancestor | Haplogroup R1 |
| Defining mutations | R1a = L62, L63. R1a1 = SRY1532.2 R1a1a = M17[1] |
| Typical members | North Indians 48%-72%, Ishkashimi Tajiks 68%, Tajiks/Khojant 64%, Sorbs 63%, Kyrgyz 63%, Poles 56%, Ukrainians 41.5%-54%, Altayans 38%-53%, Pashtuns 12%-38%, Russians 47%, Belarusians 39%-51%, Hungarians 20.4%-60% |
|---|---|
A subclade of R, R1a is a Y-chromosome haplogroup that is "currently found in central and western Asia, India, and in Slavic populations of Eastern Europe".[2] It has been found in high frequency at both extremes of its range: on the one hand in the extreme north of India, for example among the Kashmiri and Pandits (72%). In Central Asia, Ishkashimis (68%), and in the western extreme, more than (50%) of male lines amongst Sorbs, Poles, Belarusians, and Ukrainians are R1a. It is also found significant amounts extending from the central area - as far East as Siberia, and a western branch is found in Scandinavia, whence branches seem to have moved still further west, to Britain with the Vikings.
Some earlier studies came to the conclusion that R1a may have arisen 15,000 years ago in the vicinity of Ukraine, possibly expanding from either the Ukrainian LGM refuge following the end of the last ice age, or from the Pontic-Caspian steppe as a result of the Kurgan migrations.[3][4][5]. However, some newer studies show that R1a lineages may have their origins in North India [6][7] [8]. Oxford University geneticist Stephen Oppenheimer has come to the conclusion through his genetic findings that "South Asia is logically the ultimate origin of M17 and his ancestors", and that "one estimate for the age of this line in India is as much as 36,000 years old"[9].
Contents |
R1a is assumed to have originated somewhere in the Eurasian crescent where it is still most commonly found. However two leading theories have been published - one proposing origins at the end of the range, near India, and the other proposing an origin in the area of Ukraine. These two areas show the highest concentrations of R1a, but also high variation, and that is the basis of the argument in both cases.
Although in south east Europe the R1a haplogroup occurs at just 16% frequency, high-resolution Y chromosome analysis by Pericic et al. (2005) shows a maximum diversity of R1a STR variance among mainland Croatians and Bosnians. At the current resolution level the influence of gene flow to this effect is not fully understood:
At least three major episodes of gene flow might have enhanced R1a variance in the region: early post-LGM recolonizations expanding from the refugium in Ukraine, migrations from northern Pontic steppe between 3000 and 1000 B.C., as well as possibly massive Slavic migration from A.D. 5th to 7th centuries.
The gene reach maximum distribution frequencies in Poland and in Ukraine.
Kivisild et al. (2003) suggested that southern and western Asia might be the source of R1 and R1a differentiation.[10]
Earlier, Spencer Wells, director of the Genographic Project at the National Geographic Society, identified southern Russia/Ukraine as the likely origin of R1a (as identified by genetic marker M17) on the basis of both microsatellite diversity and frequency distribution.
Microsatellite diversity is greatest in southern Russia and Ukraine, suggesting that it arose there.[11]
The current distribution of the M17 haplotype is likely to represent traces of an ancient population migration originating in southern Russia/Ukraine, where M17 is found at high frequency(>50%).[4]
Wells et al. (2001) support spread of R1a with the expansion of the Kurgan people around 3,000 B.C., which may have been driven by the domestication of the horse, which also took place in southern Russia/Ukraine at about the same time:
The current distribution of the M17 haplotype is likely to represent traces of an ancient population migration originating in southern Russia/Ukraine, where M17 is found at high frequency(>50%). It is possible that the domestication of the horse in this region around 3,000 B.C. may have driven the migration. The distribution and age of M17 in Europe and Central/Southern Asia is consistent with the inferred movements of these people, who left a clear pattern of archaeological remains known as the Kurgan culture, and are thought to have spoken an early Indo-European language. The decrease in frequency eastward across Siberia to the Altai-Sayan mountains (represented by the Tuvinian population) and Mongolia, and southward into India, overlaps exactly with the inferred migrations of the Indo-Iranians during the period 3,000 to 1,000 B.C.
Passarino et al. (2002) support the Ukrainian LGM refuge scenario, that R1a expanded from the area of the Dniepr-Don Valley in Ukraine between 13 000 and 7600 years ago, after the Last Glacial Maximum receded.
Semino et al. (2000) propose a synthesis of these two explanations, suggesting that the spread of R1a from a point of origin in Ukraine following the Last Glacial Maximum may have been magnified by the expansion of males from the Kurgan culture area of present-day southern Ukraine, where according to Gimbutas proposals[12] Indo-European languages spread from. Within this context, the study also reminds us of the existence of an alternative hypothesis proposed on the basis of archeological data,[13] pointing to a Middle Eastern origin of the language family instead (see Urheimat hypotheses).
Investigation of SNP and STR markers in the Czech Republic, however, that focus on frequently related to diversity occurring within subgroup R1a1 (and two other prominent YDNA groupings), confirmed that the results are compatible with a presence of the gene during or soon after the LGM. Without any reference to Kurgan invasions, the Czech population appears to be influenced though, to a very moderate extent, by genetic inputs (E3b, J2) from outside Europe in the post-Neolithic and historical times. Population growth beginning in the first millennium B.C. was detected and found characteristic for a gene pool that already contained R1a1, next to I-M170 and P*(xR1a1).[14] The overall diversity suggests a rapid demographic expansion beginning about 60 to 80 generations ago, which would equate to about 1500 years ago (approx. 500 AD) to 2000 years ago (approx. 1 AD) with a generation time of 25 years. Similar results have been found in Lithuania.[15]
In a seminal work titled The Real Eve: Modern Man's Journey out of Africa (New York: Carroll and Graf Publishers, 2003), the prominent Oxford University scholar Stephen Oppenheimer concludes that South Asia is logically the ultimate origin of M17 and his ancestors. He observes:
| “ | And sure enough we find highest rates and greatest diversity of the M17 line in Pakistan, north India, and eastern Iran, and low rates in the Caucasus. M17 is not only more diverse in South Asia than in Central Asia but diversity characterizes its presence in isolated tribal groups in the south, thus undermining any theory of M17 as a marker of a 'male Aryan Invasion of India.' Study of the geographical distribution and the diversity of genetic branches and stems again suggests that Ruslan, along with his son M17,arose early in South Asia, somewhere near India... | ” |
In the "Peopling of South Asia: investigating the caste-tribe continuum in India", Chaubey G, Metspalu M, Kivisild T. et al arrive at the conclusion that both caste and tribal populations are autochthonous to India:"Molecular studies and archaeological record are both largely consistent with autochthonous differentiation of the genetic structure of the caste and tribal populations in South Asia. High level of endogamy created by numerous social boundaries within and between castes and tribes, along with the influence of several evolutionary forces such as genetic drift, fragmentation and long-term isolation, has kept the Indian populations diverse and distant from each other as well as from other continental populations."(Bioessays Jan 2007)
Recent studies suggest that R1a*, ancestral clade to Hg R1a1 arose in India. A study by S.Sharma et al published in the ASHG Abstracts 2007 screened 621 Y-chromosomes (of Brahmins, occupying upper most caste position and Dalits and Tribals with the lower most positions in the Indian caste hierarchical system) with fifty-five Y-chromosomal binary markers and Y-microsatellite markers and compiled a data set of 2809 Y-chromosomes (681 Bamins, 2128 Tribals and Dalits) for conclusions. Overall, no consistent difference was observed in Y-haplogroups distribution between Bamins, Dalits and Tribals, except for some differences confined to a given geographical region. The widespread distribution and high frequency across Eurasia and Central Asia of R1a1* as well as scanty representation of its ancestral (R*, R1* and R1a*) and derived lineages across the region has kept the origin of this haplogroup unresolved. The analyses of a pooled dataset of 530 Indians, 224 Pakistanis and 276 Central Asians and Eurasians,bearing R1a1* haplogroup resolved the controversy of origin of R1a1*. The conclusion was drawn on the basis of: i) presence of this haplogroup in many of the tribal populations such as, Saharia (present study) and Chenchu tribe in high frequency, ii) the highest ever reported presence of R1a* (ancestral haplogroup of R1a1*) in Kashmiri Pandits and Saharia tribe, and iii) associated averaged phylogenetic ages of R1a* (~18,478 years) and R1a1* (~13,768 years) in India.
However, Studies of India scholars showed the R1a lineage forms around 23.2%–45% among all the castes in North Indian population (Namita Mukherjee et al. 2001) and the Badagas of the Nilgiris making the association with the Brahmin caste more vague. A further study (Saha et al 2005)[16] examined R1a1 in South Indian tribals and Dravidian population groups more closely, and questioned the concept of its Indo-Iranian origin. Most recently Sengupta et al. (2005)[6] have confirmed R1a's diverse presence including even Indian tribal and lower castes (the so-called untouchables) and populations not part of the caste system. From the diversity and distinctiveness of microsatellite Y-STR variation they conclude that there must have been an independent R1a1 population in India dating back to a much earlier expansion than the Indo-Aryan migration. Sengupta concludes saying North India including the Indus Valley contributed R1a1-M17 chromosomes to both the Central Asian and South Asian tribes much before the Indo-European event.
The pattern of clustering does not support the model that the primary source of the R1a1-M17 chromosomes in India was Central Asia or the Indus Valley via Indo-European speakers[6].
According to Sengupta et al. (table 5),[6] R1* is virtually absent in Southeast and East Asia.
R1a is present at high frequency (25 percent plus) from the Czech Republic across to the Altai Mountains in Siberia and south throughout Central Asia. To the east, this gene found its way as far as Eastern Siberia, with considerable concentrations in Kamchatka and Chukotka, and it is possible that the gene even entered the Americas by this route.[17]
The modern population of Ukraine has the highest level of diversity of the gene making it the likeliest location of its origin.[3][18][11] this map[19] Even in South Eastern Europe (not a major concentration of R1a1) microsatellite networks of major Y chromosomal lineages show high diveristy of R1a1 (graph C)[19].
In Europe, R1a is found primarily in the eastern part of the continent, with the highest frequencies among the Sorbs (63.39%), Poles (56.4%),[3] , Russians (50.0%)[20] and Ukrainians (54.0%).[3] [21] An early study reported an R1a frequency of 60.0% among a sample of 45 Hungarians,[3] but a more recent study found haplogroup R1a Y-DNA in only 20.4% of a sample of 113 Hungarians.[22] The two main directional components of the spread are consistent with an East to West migration as well as a radial spread from the Balkans.[citation needed]
Pericic et al. (2005) suggest three possible explanations for the distribution of R1a variation:
At least three major episodes of gene flow might have enhanced R1a variance in the region: early post-LGM recolonizations expanding from the refugium in Ukraine, migrations from northern Pontic steppe between 3000 and 1000 B.C., as well as possibly massive Slavic migration from A.D. 5th to 7th centuries.
It is likely that Vikings settling in Britain and Ireland carried the R1a lineage,[5] which accounts for the presence of the haplogroup on those islands.[23][24]
| Please help improve this article or section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page. (December 2008) |
Exceptionally high frequencies of M17 are found among Ishkashimi Tajiks (68%), the Tajik population of Khojant (64%), and the Kyrgyz (63%), but are likely "due to drift, as these populations are less diverse, and are characterized by relatively small numbers of individuals living in isolated mountain valleys."[4].
Haplogroup R1a is also common among Mongolic- and Turkic-speaking populations of Northwestern China, such as the Bonan, Dongxiang, Salar, and Uyghur peoples.[25][26]
The R1a1 frequency in Afghanistan, northern Pakistan and northwestern India is about 50 percent or more, this makes at least 500 million men in these regions to have R1a1 lineage. The gene has proven to be a "diagnostic Indo-Iranian marker," and "it is possible to represent traces of an ancient population migration originating in southern Russia/Ukraine," where it may have been driven by the domestication of the horse around 3,000 B.C.; its distribution and age are "consistent with the inferred movements of these people, who left a clear pattern of archaeological remains known as the Kurgan culture, and are thought to have spoken an early Indo-European language".[4]In addiotion, in Central Asia it shows an expansion removal to the east (from eastern Afghanistan) and west (from eastern Iran) down to almost 30%[4][26].
The frequency of R1a1 in Iran, as in the Middle East, is about 5% to 10%.[27] Wells et al. (2001) suggest that the deserts of central Iran acted as "significant barriers to gene flow," and propose two possibilities:
| “ | Intriguingly, the population of present-day Iran, speaking a major Indo-European language (Farsi), appears to have had little genetic influence from the M17-carrying Indo-Iranians. It is possible that the pre-Indo-European population of Iran— effectively an eastern extension of the great civilizations of Mesopotamia—may have reached sufficient population densities to have swamped any genetic contribution from a small number of immigrating Indo-Iranians. If so, this may have been a case of language replacement through the ‘‘elite-dominance’’ model. Alternatively, an Indo-Iranian language may have been the lingua franca of the steppe nomads and the surrounding settled populations, facilitating communication between the two. Over time, this language could have become the predominant language in Persia, reinforced and standardized by rulers such as Cyrus the Great and Darius in the mid-first millennium B.C. Whichever model is correct, the Iranians sampled here (from the western part of the country) appear to be more similar genetically to Afro-Asiatic-speaking Middle Eastern populations than they are to Central Asians or Indians. | ” |
- Kivisild et al. (2003) on the other hand "suggests that southern and western Asia might be the source of this haplogroup":
- -
| “ | Given the geographic spread and STR diversities of sister clades R1 and R2, the latter of which is restricted to India, Pakistan, Iran, and southern central Asia (Afghanistan), it is possible that southern and western Asia were the source for R1 and R1a differentiation. | ” |
- - Kivisild et al. in their 2003 paper compare diversity of the R1a1 (R-M17) haplogroup in Indian, Pakistani, Iranian, Central Asian, Czech and Estonian populations. This study shows, that diversity of R1a1 in India, Pakistan and Iran is higher, than in Czechs (40%) and Estonians.Kivisild et al. (2003)
- - M. Regueiro et al. (2006) on high frequency of rare R1-M173* and R1a-SRY1532 lineages in Iran.[2]
| “ | From the disparate M198 frequencies observed for the north and south of Iran, it is possible to envision a movement southward towards India where the lineage may have had an influence on the populations south of the Iranian deserts and where the Dash-e Lut desert would have played a signifi cant role in preventing the expansion of this marker to the north of Iran. The lower frequencies of M198 in the region of Anatolia (11.8% in Greece and 6.9% in Turkey, with a statistically significant longitudinal correlation and the Caucasus (10% in Georgia, 6% in Armenia and 7% in Azerbaijan) suggests that population movement was southward towards India and then westward across the Iranian plateau. In addition, the detection of rare R1-M173* and R1a-SRY1532 lineages in Iran at higher frequencies than observed for either Turkey, Pakistan or India suggests the hypothesis that geographic origin of haplogroup R may be nearer Persia. | ” |
The Eastern European Y-DNA-R1a Modal Haplotype can be found in Poland, Lithuania, Belarus and Ukraine. It has spread westwards into Germany, Bohemia, Moravia, Slovakia and Hungary. Ysearch: ANJNY
| DYS | 393 | 390 | 19 | 391 | 385A | 385B | 426 | 388 | 439 | 389I | 392 | 389II | 458 | 459A | 459B | 455 | 454 | 447 | 437 | 448 | 449 | 464A | 464B | 464C | 464D |
| Alleles | 13 | 25 | 16 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 10 | 13 | 11 | 30 | 16 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 23 | 14 | 20 | 32 | 12 | 15 | 15 | 16 |
The English Y-DNA-R1a Modal Haplotype could have spread to the British Isles via the Anglo-Saxons, Vikings or Normans. Ysearch: AXEZU
| 393 | 390 | 19 | 391 | 385A | 385B | 426 | 388 | 439 | 389I | 392 | 389II | 458 | 459A | 459B | 455 | 454 | 447 | 437 | 448 | 449 | 464A | 464B | 464C | 464D | |
| Alleles | 13 | 25 | 16 | 11 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 10 | 13 | 11 | 31 | 15 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 24 | 14 | 19 | 32 | 12 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
In 2003 Oxford University researchers traced the Y-chromosome signature of Somerled of Argyll, one of Scotland's greatest warriors who is credited with driving out the Vikings. He was also the founder of Clan Donald and it is through the clan genealogies of the clan that the genetic relation was mapped out.[28] Somerled belongs to haplogroup R1a1.
In 2005 a study by Professor of Human Genetics Bryan Sykes of Oxford University led to the conclusion that Somerled has possibly 500,000 living descendants - making him the second most common historical ancestor after Genghis Khan[29]
The Y-DNA sequence is as follows (12 markers):[30]
| DYS | 393 | 390 | 19 | 391 | 385a | 385b | 426 | 388 | 439 | 389i | 392 | 389ii | 458 | 459a | 459b | 455 | 454 | 447 | 437 | 448 | 449 | 464a | 464b | 464c | 464d |
| Alleles | 13 | 25 | 15 | 11 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 10 | 14 | 11 | 31 | 16 | 8 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 23 | 14 | 20 | 31 | 12 | 15 | 15 | 16 |
Ysearch: YS495
| DYS | 393 | 390 | 19 | 391 | 385a | 385b | 426 | 388 | 439 | 389i | 392 | 389ii | 458 | 459a | 459b | 455 | 454 | 447 | 437 | 448 | 449 | 464a | 464b | 464c | 464d |
| Alleles | 13 | 25 | 15 | 11 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 10 | 13 | 11 | 31 | 15 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 14 | 21 | 32 | 12 | 12 | 14 | 14 |
Ysearch: WUZG2
R1a frequency is expressed as percentage of population samples.
| N | R1(xR1a1) | R1a1 | source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sorbs | 112 | - | 63.39 | Behar et al. (2003) |
| Hungarian | 45 | 13.3 | 60.0 | Semino et al. (2000) |
| Hungarian | 113 | 20.4 | 20.4 | Tambets et al. (2004) |
| Poles | 55 | 16.4 | 56.4 | Semino et al. (2000), Pericic et al. (2005) |
| Ukrainian | 50 | 2.0 | 54.0 | Semino et al. (2000), Pericic et al. (2005) |
| Ashkenazi Levite Jews | 60 | 21.67 | Behar et al. (2003) | |
| Belarusian | 306 | 50.98 | Behar et al. (2003) ?- Pericic et al. (2005) | |
| Russian | 122 | 7.0 | 47.0 | Pericic et al. (2005) |
| Belarusian | - | 46 | Kharkov et al. (2005) | |
| Belarusian | 41 | 10.0 | 39.0 | Pericic et al. (2005) |
| Ukrainian | - | 44 | Kharkov et al. (2004) | |
| Ukrainians, Rashkovo | 53 | 41.5 | Varzari (2006) | |
| Russian, North | 49 | 0 | 43 | Wells et al. (2001) |
| Latvian | 34 | 15.0 | 41.0 | Pericic et al. (2005) |
| Udmurt | 43 | 11.6 | 37.2 | Semino et al. (2000) |
| Pomor | 28 | 0 | 36 | Wells et al. (2001) |
| Macedonians | 20 | 10.0 | 35.0 | Semino et al. (2000) |
| Moldavians, Karahasan | 72 | 34.7 | Varzari (2006) | |
| Lithuanian | 38 | 6 | 34 | Pericic et al. (2005) |
| Croatian | 58 | 10.3 | 29.3 | Semino et al. (2000) |
| UK Orkney | 26 | 65 | 27 | Wells et al. (2001) |
| Gagauzes, Etulia | 41 | 26.8 | Varzari (2006) | |
| Czech + Slovakian | 45 | 35.6 | 26.7 | Semino et al. (2000),14 |
| Norwegian | 83 | 26.5 | Weale et al. (2002) | |
| Icelander | 181 | 41.4 | 23.8 | Pericic et al. (2005) |
| Norwegian | 87 | 21.69 | Behar et al. (2003) | |
| Moldavians, Sofia | 54 | 20.4 | Varzari (2006) | |
| Orcandin | 71 | 66.0 | 19.7 | Pericic et al. (2005) |
| Swedish (Northern) | 48 | 23.0 | 19.0 | Pericic et al. (2005) |
| Swedish | 110 | 20.0 | 17.3 | Pericic et al. (2005) |
| Danish | 12 | 41.7 | 16.7 | Pericic et al. (2005) |
| Mari | 46 | 0 | 13.0 | Semino et al. (2000) |
| German | 88 | 12.50 | Behar et al. (2003) | |
| German | 48 | 47.9 | 8.1 | Pericic et al. (2005) |
| Greek | 76 | 27.6 | 11.8 | Semino et al. (2000) |
| Albanian | 51 | 17.6 | 9.8 | Semino et al. (2000) |
| Saami | 24 | 8.3 | 8.3 | Semino et al. (2000) |
| UK Isle of Man | 62 | 15 | 8 | Capelli et al. (2003) |
| UK Orkney | 121 | 23 | 7 | Capelli et al. (2003) ?? 7% <> 23% *5 |
| UK | 309 | ~7 | Weale et al. (2002) | |
| Georgian | 63 | 14.3 | 7.9 | Semino et al. (2000) |
| Turkish | 523 | 16.3 | 6.9 | Cinnioğlu et al. (2004) |
| UK Shetland | 63 | 17 | 6 | Capelli et al. (2003) |
| UK Chippenham | 51 | 16 | 6 | Capelli et al. (2003) |
| UK Cornwall | 52 | 25 | 6 | Capelli et al. (2003) |
| Dutch | 27 | 70.4 | 3.7 | Semino et al. (2000) |
| German | 16 | 50.0 | 6.2 | Semino et al. (2000) |
| Italian central/north | 50 | 62.0 | 4.0 | Semino et al. (2000) |
| British | ~1000 | ~4 | Capelli et al. (2003) | |
| Irish | 222 | 81.5 | 0.5 | Pericic et al. (2005) |
| Calabrian | 37 | 32.4 | 0 | Semino et al. (2000) |
| Sardinian | 77 | 22.1 | Semino et al. (2000) | |
| British | 25 | 72 | 0 | Wells et al. (2001) |
| Poles | 913 | 11.6 | 57 | Kayser et al. (2005) |
| Germans | 1215 | 38.9 | 17.9 | Kayser et al. (2005) |
| Dniester-Carpathian | - | 50.06 | Varzari (2006) | |
| Gagauzes, Kongaz | 48 | 12.5 | Varzari (2006) |
N R1* R1a1(%) Sr. Published
Ishkashimis 25 4 68 5 Wells et al. (2001)
Tajiks/Khojant 22 0 64 5 Wells et al. (2001)
Chamar - Indian untouchable 60
Tajiks/Samarkand 40 10 45 5 Wells et al. (2001)
Kyrgyz 52 2 63 5 Wells et al. (2001)
Southern Altays 96 1 53 V. N. Kharkov et al. (2007)
Tashkent IE 69 7 47 ?
India Upper Caste 86 - 45.35 8
Sourasthran 46 0 39 5 Wells et al. (2001)
Abkhazians 12 8 33 7 Nasidze,2004
Chenchus (India-Drav.) - - 26 12
Kazan Tatar 38 3 24 5 Wells et al. (2001)
Saami 23 9 22 5 Wells et al. (2001)
Uyghur 49 ≤8.2 28.6 Ruixia Zhou et al. (2007)
Dongxiang 49 <10 28 Wei Wang et al.,2003
Bonan 47 0 26 Wei Wang et al.,2003
Salar 52 <10 17 Wei Wang et al.,2003
Iran (Tehran) 24 4 4 5 Wells et al. (2001)
Iran (Tehran) 80 8 20 7 Nasidze,2004
Iran (Isfahan) 50 0 18 7 Nasidze,2004
Pashtuns 96 4.2 12-38 Firasat et al. (2007)
Kalash 44 2.3 18.2 Firasat et al. (2007)
Burusho 97 1.0 27.8 Firasat et al. (2007)
Pakistan 638 5.6 37.1 Firasat et al. (2007)
Pakistan ?? 85 1.10 16.47 8 ?
Pakistan 175 0.57 24.43 8 ?
Pakistan south 91 0 31.87 8 ?
India 728 0 15.8 8 ?
India 325 0.3 27 12 ?
India (Kashmiri Pandits) - - 72.22 Sharma et al. (2007)
Tuvian 42 2 14 5 Wells et al. (2001)
Abazinians 14 0 14 7 Nasidze,2004(*7)
Georgians 77 10 10 7 Nasidze,2004(*7)
Kurd 17 29 12 5 Wells et al. (2001)
Nenets 54 4 11 5 Wells et al. (2001)
Syrian 20 10 10 1
Lebanese 31 20.0 9.7 Semino et al. (2000)
Turkmen 21 52.4 4.8 Zerjal et al. (2002)
Turkmen 30 37 7 5 Wells et al. (2001)
Lezgi(S.Caucasus) 12 17 8 7 Nasidze,2004(*7)
Svans 25 0 8 7 Nasidze,2004(*7)
Azerbaijanians 72 11 7 7 Nasidze,2004(*7)
Armenians 100 19 6 7 Nasidze,2004(*7)
Armenians 47 36 9 5 Wells et al. (2001)
Armenians 734 32.7 5.0 Weale et al. (2001)
S.Ossetians 17 12 6 5 Wells et al. (2001)
Kazaks 54 6 4 5 Wells et al. (2001)
Chechenians 19 0 5 7 Nasidze,2004(*7)
Kallar Dravidian 84 0 4 5 Wells et al. (2001)
Mongolian 24 0 4 5 Wells et al. (2001)
Ossetians (Ardon) 28 0 4 7 Nasidze,2004(*7)
Kazbegi 25 8 4 7 Nasidze,2004(*7)
India Dravidian (Tribal) 180 - 2.78 8
Kabardinians 59 2 2 7 Nasidze,2004(*7)
Lezgi(Dagestan) 25 4 0 7 Nasidze,2004(*7)
Ossetians (Digora) 31 0 0 7 Nasidze,2004(*7)
Rutulians 24 0 0 7 Nasidze,2004(*7)
Darginians 26 4 0 7 Nasidze,2004(*7)
Ingushians 22 0 0 7 Nasidze,2004(*7)
Cambodia 6 0 0 8 ?
China 127 0 0 8
Japan 23 0 0 8
Siberia 18 0 0 8 ?
Publications:
Bryan Sykes in his book Blood of the Isles gives (from his imagination) the populations associated with R1a in Europe the name of Sigurd for a clan patriarch, much as he did for mitochondrial haplogroups in his work The Seven Daughters of Eve.
|
Human Y-chromosome DNA (Y-DNA) haplogroups (by ethnic groups · famous haplotypes) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| most recent common Y-ancestor | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| A | BT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| B | CT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CF | DE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| C | F | D | E | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| G | H | IJK | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IJ | K | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| I | J | L | M | NO | P | S | T | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| N | O | Q | R | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Haplogroup R |
|
|||||||||||||||